Maximum width of tile maps on Dazzler

[mattp]

I've started moving my tilemap code from the 3x to the Dazzler. I seem to have hit a problem where my 32x32 tiles are cut off past column 31. (32 x 16 x X)
The rows and the gradient are correct, just the columns are missing.

It would fill the screen width on the 3x - so I'm puzzled, is there a different setup? Could anyone help? All the demos are working fine.

(Fantastic board by the way, I'm using it with a Maixduino)

Thanks,

Matt


GD.begin();
LOAD_ASSETS();
Serial.begin(115200);

GD.Clear();
GD.cmd_gradient(0, 0, 0xf6b683, 0, 720, 0xf58f3d);

GD.Begin(BITMAPS);
GD.BlendFunc(ONE, ONE_MINUS_SRC_ALPHA);
GD.BitmapHandle(DESERT_HANDLE); //set the Pointer

cell = 0;

for (int j = 0; j < 720/32; j++) {
for (int i = 0; i < 1280/32; i++) {

if (level1[cell] > 0) {
GD.Cell(level1[cell] - 1);
GD.Vertex2f(i * 32 * 16, j * 32 * 16);
}
cell ++;
}
}

GD.swap();

static const PROGMEM uint8_t level1[] = {
4,72,72,72,72,72,72,72,72,72,72,72,72,72,72,72,72,72,72,72,72,72,72,72,72,72,72,72,72,72,72,72,72,72,89,89,89,89,0,0,
0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,72,72,72,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,
0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,
0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,
0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,
0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,72,72,72,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,72,72,72,
0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,
0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,
0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,
0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,
0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,
0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,
0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,
0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,
0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,
0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,
0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,
0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,
0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,
0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,
0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,72,72,72,
0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,72,72,72,0,0,0,0,72,72,72};



[jamesbowman]

Right, this is the large screen size of the Dazzler. In default mode Vertex2f only has a range up to 1023, not enough for the Dazzler's 1280-wide screen.

So instead of:

GD.Vertex2f(i * 32 * 16, j * 32 * 16);
do:

GD.VertexFormat(3);
...
GD.Vertex2f(i * 32 * 8, j * 32 * 8);
There's an item on this in the gd2-lib FAQ: github.com/jamesbowman/gd2-lib/blob/master/README.md

[mattp]

Thank you! Perfect